Yann

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

/archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54

• User:Yann/Valued images, 2009-2014, 2015-2016, 2017-2019
• User:Yann/Quality images, 2005-2014, 2015-2016, 2017-2023
• User:Yann/Featured images, 2009-2018, 2019-2023
• User:Yann/Featured media

God is busy, may I help you? / Dieu est occupé, puis-je vous aider?

You can leave me a message in English or French, at the bottom. Click here. Yann 22:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Sebastian Terteryan

Hi since it seems you handled the other uploads perhaps you can assist with this too: given history of the uploader using images taken by others, this File:Sebastian Terteryan jpg.jpg is somewhat unlikely own work either. I'm unsure how to proceed, there's a similar but not identical here https://www.tiktok.com/@sebtheboxer TherasTaneel (talk) 07:35, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

 Done I found the source, deleted. Yann (talk) 09:25, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Gperez24.jpg

Hola Yann, ¿por favor, me podrías decir exactamente cual es la evidencia que quieres encontrar en la foto para asegurarte que la foto es mía? Yo personalmente saqué esa foto el pasado mes de octubre y en la autoria de la imagen indique que poseo el copyright. No entiendo el motivo por el cual se pone en duda mi autoría, cuando he subido otras fotos de manera similar y no he tenido problemas. Gracias por adelantado. UN cordial saludo, --Hard (talk) 09:19, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

@Hard: Please upload the original image with EXIF data. This is good portrait by the way. Yann (talk) 09:22, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Hola @Yann, muchas gracias por tu rápida respuesta. Voy a buscar el original y lo subiré directamente a Commons con los datos que comentas. Un cordial saludo, Hard (talk) 09:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

<Google Translate>Sube la imagen original con los datos EXIF. Por cierto, es un buen retrato.</Google Translate>

Hola de nuevo, @Yann: , acabo de subir la foto. Espero que todo esté correcto. Muchas gracias por tu ayuda. Un cordial saludo, --Hard (talk) 14:15, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

@Hard: File:Gperez2024.jpg n'est pas l'image originale, mais une version très réduite, et sans EXIF data. Si vous ne pouvez pas importer l'image originale, merci d'envoyez une autorisation via COM:VRT/es. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:20, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

<Google Translate>File:Gperez2024.jpg no es la imagen original, sino una versión muy reducida, y sin datos EXIF. Si no puede importar la imagen original, envíe permiso a través de COM:VRT/es.</Google Translate> Yann (talk) 14:20, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Hola Yann,

Acabo de enviar el correo:

Por la presente declaro que soy el titular de los derechos de autor exclusivos de Gperez2024.jpg [1].

Consiento publicar dicha obra bajo la licencia libre Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (BY-SA-4.0).

Reconozco que concedo a cualquiera el derecho a usar la imagen en un producto comercial, así como a modificarla de acuerdo a sus necesidades.

Soy consciente de que siempre retendré los derechos de autor de mi imagen, así como el derecho a ser reconocido como autor según los términos de la licencia elegida para mi obra. Las modificaciones que otros hagan a la imagen no me serán atribuidas.

Soy consciente de que la licencia libre sólo afecta a los derechos de autor, y me reservo del derecho de emprender acciones legales contra cualquiera que use esta obra violando cualquier otra ley, como restricciones de marcas registradas, libelo o restricciones geográficas específicas.

Reconozco que no puedo retractarme de este acuerdo, y que la imagen puede o no ser almacenada permanentemente en un proyecto de la Fundación Wikimedia.

(He firmado con mi nombre real (Hard)]

1 de noviembre de 2024.

Espero que esté todo correcto. Muchas gracias por tu ayuda!. Un cordial saludo, Hard (talk) 14:31, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

@Hard: This should be sent to permissions-es@wikimedia.org. Thanks, Yann (talk)

@Yann: si, disculpa por no incluir el destinatario en mi mensaje. El mensaje que te envié lo había enviado a la dirección que me señalaste. Gracias de nuevo. Un cordial saludo, --Hard (talk) 14:42, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

@Yann: ya está solucionado. MUchas gracias por tu valiosa ayuda, sin la cual posiblemente no habría podiso solucionar este asunto. Un cordial saludo, --Hard (talk) 14:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

2014 in Occitanie

Bonsoir, un grand merci pour ton aide. Your request is malformed m'a été d'un grand secours pour ne pas comprendre en quoi elle était malformée. En tant qu'enseignant, j'apprécie autant de pédagogie. Bonne soirée. --Birdie (talk) 17:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Revert

I'd love to know how exactly a multi-paragraph section explaining what "Monuments historiques" are with a "see also" and "External links" section isn't "encyclopedic content." I guess I could just renominate it for G1 since it only has a single image but the whole thing really just comes off as pointlessly nitpicky and I'm sure you'd come up with some other reason to revert it anyway. Adamant1 (talk) 19:37, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

BTW, I don't really care if you revert me but I would like an explanation and/or for to tell me what I should use instead if G2 isn't valid. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:42, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Threshold of Originality for Text-Only Logo

Hi, I recently had a logo removed and a copyright strike added, but the logo was just plain text. Could you please help me to understand how that TV show logo was above the threshold of originality when the Amtrak logo on the Commons:Threshold of originality page is not? I genuinely don't understand what I did wrong, or how I misunderstood what the threshold is. Additionally, isn't the logo able to be retained for the namesake Wikipedia article (here) since there isn't a copyright free replacement? Thank you in advance for clarifying this. Pastelitodepapa (talk) 08:21, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

@Pastelitodepapa: Hi, The text might be OK, although there is a complex 3D effect, but the background is certainly not. Yann (talk) 08:35, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Oh okay, if I remove the background to just show the text logo for the show would that be okay with Wikimedia standards? Or is the simple vertical text drop-shadow enough originality to merit copyright? It doesn't look like a complex 3D effect to me to be honest. If not, am I able to upload the original image I had to Wikipedia to use just on its specific page since there isn't a copyright-free substitute for the show's logo of poster as is done on this Wikipedia page of another TLC show for instance? I'm just trying to understand how to do this all correctly. Thank you again. Pastelitodepapa (talk) 08:58, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

@Pastelitodepapa: Not sure, you better ask on COM:VPC to have a second opinion. Yann (talk) 09:09, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Copyright violation

Hello, I saw that you deleted the following photos :

• File:Macromia splendens mâle de profil émergeant.jpg
• File:Macromia splendens mâle venant d'émerger.jpg
• File:Exuvie de Macromia splendens.jpg

They received a copyright violation because they are indeed on the INaturalist site but the author of these photos: Esteban Prat is a very good friend of mine, we see each other often and the latter authorized me (written proof to support) to use these photos. How can I do so that the photos are not deleted? Best regards JeSuisTropSalty (talk) 16:39, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

@JeSuisTropSalty: Please ask the author to change the license on INaturalist. Non commercial licenses are not accepted on Commons. Then you can ask for undeletion on COM:UDR. Yann (talk) 16:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Probably sockpuppets

Hi Yann,
I found a group of probable puppets.

• Judas Eukaryon
• Йіоїсўс Хріоїстос
• Віоїрел Ніоїколаевіоїч Гельберт
• Николай Николаевич Гельберт
• User:Гельберт Виталий Николаевич
• User:Ecaterina Ghelbert
• Дракў Архитектор

Similar uploads (out of scope) on similar topics. Also, there are similarities in usernames.
With best regards, -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:24, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Aspects of twentieth century painting, 1963.pdf

File:Aspects of twentieth century painting, 1963.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Omphalographer (talk) 03:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

help

Hi @Yann. I'm a bit confused here. One of the two files shows Instagram reel as a previous publication but has enough EXIF data & quality but I doubt it being own work. What would be your advice in such cases? There's one more upload and that's also unlikely own. My mind says DR, but I'd want to hear from you. _Regards, Aafi ^(talk) 13:25, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

@Aafi: Yes, I agree that this seems a bit suspicious. A VRT permission is needed IMO. Yann (talk) 15:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

ok. I started a DR. _Regards, Aafi ^(talk) 16:50, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

File:John ('Jock') Middleton Campbell, Baron Campbell of Eskan.jpg

Was there a convincing reason to delete this image? Two hours ago, I replaced the {{Copyvio}} with an ordinary {{Delete}} as per instructions and explained at the talk page that the image (in that limited form) is released under Creative Commons license by the UK's National Portrait Gallery. I return now to find that you have deleted it anyway. What have I missed? JMF (talk) 13:29, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

@JMF: Commons:Deletion requests/John ('Jock') Middleton Campbell, Baron Campbell of Eskan seems entirely broken. _Regards, Aafi ^(talk) 14:50, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

@JMF Hi, The license at source is CC-BY-NC-ND-3.0 which is not acceptable on Commons. This is a photograph by Godfrey Argent (1937-2006), so it is still under a copyright. And yes, your deletion request is broken. Yann (talk) 14:58, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Video files

Hello Yann, I had uploaded 19 videos of music production company:Saregama Carnatic Classical at Youtube, all licensed under: ‘Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)’ (mentioned in the bottom of description page of source). But somebody has nominated it for deletion without checking. Could you plz resolve the files? All listed in this category:Category:Videos of M. S. Subbulakshmi.
--Gpkp (talk) 17:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

@Gpkp: The files are not deleted yet. You can contest the speedy deletion request to a regular one, and explain why they should be kept. I agree that a speedy DR is not the best anyway, as there is a free license at the source. However I am not sure if the license is valid. What is the relation between the YT account and the music authors? Yann (talk) 17:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Thank you Yann. --Gpkp (talk) 17:22, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Saregama is the offical owners who published and sold the music/songs of the authors under their Record label. They now own a Youtube account where they are uploading few of their music under free-license: ‘Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)’.
--Gpkp (talk) 17:47, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Yann, this file: File:Srinivasa Thiruvenkata Carnatic Song with Lyrics M S Subbulakshmi Carnatic Vocal.webm is deleted. Is it possible to undelete it? It was free licensed by the official publishers of the music in Youtube. --Gpkp (talk) 18:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

OK, done. Yann (talk) 18:28, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Thank you Yann. --Gpkp (talk) 06:37, 11 November 2024 (UTC)